Alphabet has asked a federal judge to delay a trial in Waymo's war with Uber
Alphabet has asked a federal judge to delay a trial in its lawsuit against Uber, arguing that new evidence produced by the ride-hailing company requires more time to digest â" and possibly more claims of trade-secret theft still to come.
Earlier this month, a federal court in California delivered Alphabetâs self-driving car unit, Waymo, a major victory: It ordered that Uber had to turn over a âdue diligenceâ report that it commissioned at the time it purchased Otto, the self-driving truck company started by Anthony Levand owski after leaving Google.
Since that September 13 decision, though, Waymo alleged that Uber and the firm that prepared the report, Stroz Friedberg, have âproduced or made available a small portion of the material required.â Waymoâs lawyers still havenât seen all of the communications and documents related to its preparation, they told the judge. And the Alphabet self-driving unit stressed it needed additional time depose a number of key players in the case, including another session with former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, it said in its filing.
To that end, Alphabet argued it would be âunfairly prejudiced if the trial proceeds as initially scheduled on October 10 without additional time to pursue this mountain of new evidence.â
A spokesman for Uber did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Saturday night. A delayed trial, however, could give both sides more time to talk about a potential settlement.
For now, though, the new filin g from Waymoâs lawyers argued that the so-called Stroz Report âunequivocally establishes the facts underlying Waymoâs trade secret misappropriation claims.â Alphabet has maintained that Levandowski downloaded 14,000 files of proprietary information before leaving Google for Otto, then Uber.
To be sure, Alphabet redacted a number of the conclusions itâs drawn from documents that Uber and Stroz have produced. But the Google parent company did say the evidence is substantial enough that it cannot commit to limiting its claims of trade secret theft to nine instances, as the court initially prescribed.
âWaymo should not and cannot be forced to waive claims for misappropriation of trade secrets in addition to the nine trade secrets Waymo has designated for trial,â the company said.recode_divider
More From Recode
- A SoftBank executive stresses theyâre not just throwing around cash when it comes to ride hailing
- Twitter says itâs fixed a âbugâ that allowed ad campaigns to target users with derogatory terms
- Full video: John Foley, founder and CEO of Peloton, at Code Commerce
- Full video: Mike Vaughan of Venmo at Code Commerce
- Full transcript: Mother Jones Editor in Chief Clara Jeffery on Recode Media
- Full video: Matt Zeiler of Clarifai at Code Commerce
Sign up for our Recode Daily newsletter to get the top tech and business news stories delivered to your inbox.This Article has a component height of 9. The sidebar size is medium.Source: Google News